📄

Paper

Education and Training Assessment and Artificial Intelligence. A Pragmatic Guide for Educators

by Independent / Community 00464c00ca5e4ae2edd5f09f36e5c4992cd3f1e5

Free2AITools Nexus Index

66.7

S: Semantic 50

Query-time baseline · scored live at search

A: Authority 79

P: Popularity 54

R: Recency 100

Q: Quality 65

Tech Context

Vital Performance —

The emergence of ChatGPT and similar new Generative AI tools has created concern about the validity of many current assessment methods in higher education, since learners might use these tools to complete those assessments. Here we review the current evidence on this issue and show that for assessments like essays and multiple-choice exams, these concerns are legitimate: ChatGPT can complete them to a very high standard, quickly and cheaply. We consider how to assess learning in alternative w...

Source →

Semantic Scholar 16 Citations

Paper Information Summary
Entity Passport
Registry ID	00464c00ca5e4ae2edd5f09f36e5c4992cd3f1e5
License	ArXiv
Provider	semantic_scholar

📜

Cite this paper

Academic & Research Attribution

BibTeX

@misc{00464c00ca5e4ae2edd5f09f36e5c4992cd3f1e5,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Education and Training Assessment and Artificial Intelligence. A Pragmatic Guide for Educators Paper},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://api.semanticscholar.org/00464c00ca5e4ae2edd5f09f36e5c4992cd3f1e5}},
  note = {Accessed via Free2AITools.}
}

APA Style

Unknown. (2026). Education and Training Assessment and Artificial Intelligence. A Pragmatic Guide for Educators [Paper]. Free2AITools. https://api.semanticscholar.org/00464c00ca5e4ae2edd5f09f36e5c4992cd3f1e5

🔬Technical Deep Dive

Full Specifications [+]

⚖️ Free2AITools Nexus Index V2.0

Methodology How FNI works

Semantic (S) 50

Query-time baseline · scored live at search

Authority (A) 79

Popularity (P) 54

Recency (R) 100

Quality (Q) 65

💬 Index Insight

FNI V2.0 for Education and Training Assessment and Artificial Intelligence. A Pragmatic Guide for Educators: Authority (A:79), Popularity (P:54), Recency (R:100), Quality (Q:65). Semantic (S) is a query-time baseline scored live at search.

Free2AITools Nexus Index

Data Sources / Provenance

HuggingFace API GitHub Metadata Arxiv Citation DB Methodology

Open data Updated: Live data

📝 Executive Summary

"The emergence of ChatGPT and similar new Generative AI tools has created concern about the validity of many current assessment methods in higher education, since learners might use these tools to complete those assessments. Here we review the current evidence on this issue and show that for assessments like essays and multiple-choice exams, these concerns are legitimate: ChatGPT can complete them to a very high standard, quickly and cheaply. We consider how to assess learning in alternative w..."

❝ Cite Node

@article{Unknown2026Education,
  title={Education and Training Assessment and Artificial Intelligence. A Pragmatic Guide for Educators},
  author={},
  note={Indexed by Free2AITools},
  year={2026}
}

🔗 Full Paper

Free2AITools indexes the abstract and factual metadata for this paper. Read the complete, authoritative paper on the official source.

Read the full paper on arXiv

📊 Research Signals

📈16CitationsSemantic Scholar

🏛️79AuthorityFNI pillar

⏱️100RecencyFNI pillar

✅65QualityFNI pillar

🗂️knowledge retrievalField

🏷️ Research Topics

chat models

📦Data Source: semantic_scholar

🔄 Updated daily

Source summary: Based on semantic_scholar metadata. Not a recommendation.

📊 FNI Methodology 📚 Knowledge Baseℹ️ Verify with original source

🛡️ Paper Transparency Report

Technical metadata sourced from upstream repositories.

Open Metadata

🆔 Identity & Source

source: semantic_scholar
author: Unknown
license: ArXiv
tags: paper, research, academic

⚙️ Technical Specs

architecture: null
params billions: null
context length: null
pipeline tag

📊 Engagement & Metrics

downloads: 0
stars: null
forks: null
citations: 16

Data indexed from public sources. Updated daily.